ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
JMBS
  • 30 of 49
Up
JMBS 2019, 4(4): 189–194
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs04.04.189
Dentistry

Comparative Evaluation of Microcrystallization Indices of Oral Fluid Indifferent Complexes of Postoperative Treatment in Patients with Chronic Odontogenic Sinusitis of Maxillary Sinus

Pohodenko-Chudakva I. O., Surin A. V.
Abstract

At the moment, oral fluid is the best option from all biological fluids of the body for the study since its preparation is not associated with invasive manipulations and does not require specially equipped facilities, expensive equipment and specially trained stuff. If necessary, it can be used several times. In the last decade the number of examinations in microcrystallization of biological fluids is significantly increased including in oral fluid. There are works that indicate the possibility of correction of these indices. There are also studies proving the positive effect of reflexotherapy on this indicator. The purpose of the work is to carry out a comparative assessment of the microcrystallization indices of oral fluid in patients with chronic odontogenic sinusitis of the maxillary sinus with a standard complex of postoperative treatment and rehabilitation measures and when used as part of the rehabilitation complex of electroacupuncture. Material and methods. 40 patients aged 18-50 years with chronic odontogenic sinusitis of the maxillary sinus were observed. Group 1 (20 persons) included patients who had standard treatment after the operation. Group 2 (20 patients) comprised electroacupuncture in the treatment. A group of 20 healthy individuals made up group 3. Rate of microcrystallization of oral fluid was determined in accordance with the method described by I. O. Pohodenko-Chudakova et al. (2011). Results and discussion. The rate of microcrystallization of oral fluid in patients of group 1 was 2.42 (1.88-3.00) and group 2 it was 2.67 (1.38-2.55). On the 12th day after surgery the rate of microcrystallization of oral fluid in group 1 decreased to 2.30 (1.88-2.75). At the same time it should be emphasized that these changes were not directional (χ2=3.19; p<0.36). In the same period of follow-up in patients of group 2, a decrease in the studied index to values of 1.67 (1.42-2.17) was observed and this dynamics was directional (χ2=22.4; p<0.00). When comparing the results of the 4th study and the initial values (before the operation), a significant difference was found (T1-4=12.5; p=0.00). Conclusions. The presented results of comparative assessment of the dynamics of microcrystallization of oral fluid in patients with chronic odontogenic sinusitis of the maxillary sinus in various complexes of postoperative treatment strongly support the use of patients in this category in the postoperative rehabilitation of electroacupuncture. The results prove the informative and diagnostic effectiveness of the indices of microcrystallization of oral fluid which can be successfully used in patients with chronic odontogenic sinusitis of the maxillary sinus. Moreover, they are the basis for wider implementation in everyday clinical practice of electroreflexotherapy for specified category of patients.

Keywords: chronic sinusitis, microcrystallization, oral fluid, electro-reflexology

Full text: PDF (Rus) 227K

References
  1. Sipkin AM, Nikitin AA, Lapshin VP, Nikitin DA, Chukumov RM, Kryazhinova IA. Verhnecheljustnoj sinusit: sovremennyj vzgljad na diagnostiku, lechenie i reabilitaciju. Alm of Clin Med. 2013; 28: 82˗7. [Russian]
  2. Ignatovich AP, Pohodenko-Chuakova IO. Sravnitel'naja ocenka jeffektivnosti igloukalyvanija i DENS-terapii, primenjaemyh dlja profilaktiki posleoperacionnyh oslozhnenij pri vmeshatel'stvah v polosti rta na osnovanii pokazatelja mikrokristallizacii rotovoj zhidkosti. Integrative medicine in maxillofacial surgery and dentistry: Proc of the Sci and Pract Conf with Interna. Participat "Parin readings 2014". Minsk: Ed BSU Center; 2014. p. 420˗2. [Russian]
  3. Domenyuk DA, Vedeshina EG, Dmitrienko SV, Kalashnikova SA. Kachestvennaja i kolichestvennaja ocenka kristallografii rotovoj zhidkosti v norme i pri zubocheljustnoj patologii. Kuban Sci Med Bull. 2016; 160(5): 38-47. [Russian]
  4. Koshel' IV, Shhetinin EV, Sirak SV. Patofiziologicheskie mehanizmy odontogennogo verhnecheljustnogo sinusita. Rus Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 5: 36-42. [Russian]
  5. Kulapina OI, Mikhalova MS. Izuchenie farmakokinetiki cefuroksima po dinamike ego raspredelenija v rotovoj zhidkosti rotovoj polosti bol'nyh sinusitami. Antibiot and Chemother. 2014; 59: 9-10. [Russian]
  6. Mjakishev JuV, Kolsanov AV, Vlasov MJu, Sokolov AV. Neinvazivnaja diagnostika sostojanija obmennyh processov v organizme: markery rotovoj zhidkosti. Modern Probl of Sci and Educ. 2017; 5: 14. Available from: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=26739 (accessed 01.03.2019). [Russian]
  7. Nikolenko VN, Kozlov SV, Kochurova EV. Diagnosticheskaja znachimost' issledovanija rotovoj zhidkosti v onkologii. Head and neck tumors (HNT). 2013; 1: 39-42. [Russian]
  8. Piskunov GZ, Piskunov SZ. Klinicheskaja rinologija. M: Medical Iinformation Agency; 2017. 750 s. [Russian]
  9. Popov NN, Ognivenko EV, Romanova EA. Harakter immunnyh perestroek u bol'nyh ostrym gnojnym verhnecheljustnym sinusitom. The J of VN Karazin KhNU, Ser “Medicine”. 2005; 705(11): 84˗8. [Russian]
  10. Pohodenko-Chuakova IO, Kravchenko VO. Sopostavlenie prognosticheskoj jeffektivnosti indeksa sdviga lejkocitov krovi i pokazatelja mikrokristallizacii rotovoj zhidkosti u pacientov s ostrym odontogennym sinusitom verhnecheljustnoj pazuhi. Modern views on topical issues of theoretical, experimentally and practical medicine: collection, Sc. works on topical issues of medicine, dentistry, international Sci- prakt Conf privac in memory of prof VP Golik. Kharkiv: KhNMU; 2016. p. 159-61. [Russian]
  11. Pohodenko-Chudakova IO, Kazakova YM, Pokhadenko ND. Sposob ocenki jeffektivnosti provedennogo lechebnogo meroprijatija pri gnojno-vospalitel'nom zabolevanii cheljustno-licevoj oblasti: patent Resp. Belarus' № 14565. Official Bull Invent, Utility Models, Industr Designs. 2011; 80(3): 137. [Russian]
  12. Pohodenko-Chudakova IO, Barmutzkaya AZ, Surin AV. Taktika hirurgicheskogo lechenija odontogennogo hronicheskogo sinusita v oblasti dna verhnecheljustnoj pazuhi. Novosti Khirugii, 2015; 23(3): 314-9. [Russian]
  13. Rebrova OYu. Statisticheskij analiz medicinskih dannyh. Primenenie paketa prikladnyh programm STATISTICA. M: Media sphere; 2002. 312 s. [Russian] https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2015.3.314
  14. Sakovich AR. Harakteristika intoksikacii pri ostrom gnojnom sinusite s pozicii kompleksnoj ocenki. Med J. 2014; 4: 109-12. [Russian]
  15. Surin AV, Pohodenko-Chudakova IO. Sravnitel'naja ocenka izmenenij biohimicheskih pokazatelej rotovoj zhidkosti pacientov s hronicheskim odontogennym sinusitom pri standartnom lechenii i pri ispol'zovanii jelektrorefleksoterapii. Ukr J of Med, Biol and Sport. 2019; 4(1): 207-13. [Russian] https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs04.01.207
  16. Te EA, Chashhina AO. Vlijanie sredstv gigieny na mikrokristallizaciju sljuny. J the Dent Institute. 2015; 3: 82-3. [Russian]
  17. Har'kova NA. Jeffektivnost' polifunkcional'nogo perevjazochnogo sredstva v posleoperacionnoj reabilitacii u pacientov s gnojno-obstruktivnymi processami v zakrytyh polostjah LOR-organov. Fundament Study 2014; 10(10): 1984-8. [Russian]
  18. Shatohina SN, Sambulov VI. Struktura nekletochnyh tkanej organizma i ih znachenie v otorinolaringologii. Almanac of Clin Med. 2016; 44(7): 857-65. https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2016-44-7-857-865 [Russian]
  19. Saelices L, Sievers SA, Sawaya MR, Eisenberg DS. Crystal structures of amyloidogenic segments of human transthyretin. Protein Sci. 2018; 27(7): 1295-303. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3420
  20. Kaczor-Urbanowicz KE, Martin Carreras-Presas C, Aro K, Tu M, Garcia-Godoy F, Wong DT. Saliva diagnostics - current views and directions. Exp Biol Med. 2017; 242 (5): 459-72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27903834. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5367650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370216681550
  21. Malon RS, Sadir S, Balakrishnan M, Córcoles EP. Saliva-based biosensors: noninvasive monitoring tool for clinical diagnostics. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 962903. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276835. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4172994. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/962903
  22. Saeves R, Nordgarden H, Storhaug K, Sandvik L, Espelid I. Salivary flow rate and oral findings in Prader-Willi syndrome: a case-control study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015; 22(1): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21702855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01153.x
  23. Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos Ch. Maxillofacial сone beam computed tomography: principles, techniques and clinical applications. Berlin: Springer; 2018; 1241 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62061-9