ISSN 2415-3060 (print), ISSN 2522-4972 (online)
JMBS
  • 9 of 44
Up
JMBS 2019, 4(2): 59–68
https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs04.02.059
Medicine. Reviews

Quality of Treatment with Orthopedic Constructions as a Problem of Clinical Dentistry (Literature Review)

Yanishen I., Iarova A., Berezhnaia O., Dolia A., Bohatyrenko M.
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to increase the effectiveness of orthopedic treatment of dental patients through the introduction of methodological approaches to assessing the quality of treatment with orthopedic dentures. The risk assessment information system was considered for the orthopedic treatment of patients with dentition defects using unremovable dentures, as well as individual prediction of results, with the goal of optimizing them and preventing possible complications. Particular attention should be paid to increasing the quality of treatment in orthopedic dentistry on the basis of innovative developments in the field of dental material science due to the justified selection of structural and auxiliary dental materials, by eliminating the negative factors of the influence dentures, caused or their components or structures, and deficiencies on the clinical and laboratory stages of denture manufacturing. Equally important is the analysis of the quality of imprints during making working model. Disinfection and preservation of imprints can significantly affect their dimensional accuracywhich influences the precision accuracy of dentures. We noted the methods for evaluating the quality of additional and basic structural materials, which are in direct dependence on the composition, properties of dental materials, and technical facilities of the institution where such work is carried out. Scientific literature shows that the problem of creating an integral system of control over the quality of orthopedic treatment is extremely important. At the same time it is indicated that there are no integral accepted criteria for assessing the quality of dentures and the quality of orthopedic trtatment in general. The analysis of literature sources suggests the relevance of the problem of improving the quality of orthopedic treatment of dental patients. It is necessary to emphasize the close relationship between clinical and technological (reasonable selection of tooth-technical materials) and medical and psychological factors of treatment. Significant differences in the components of the proposed systems and evaluation algorithms in orthopedic dentistry do not simplify their perception and understanding in chosing the type of denture and the choice of dental technology. The current state of orthopedic service in Ukraine requires the immediate creation and implementation of a single system for assessing the quality of dental orthopedic treatment to fully satisfy both doctors and patients.

Keywords: quality of treatment, orthopedic dentures, comparative analysis, the result of treatment

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 248K

References
  1. Bondarenko NN. Audit kachestva kak obektivnaya neobkhodimost v usloviyakh reformirovaniya stomatologicheskoy sluzhby. Stomatolog. 2006; 2: 3-6. [Russian]
  2. Ermoshina MYu. Defekty meditsinskoy dokumentatsii: znachenie dlya nastupleniya grazhdansko-pravovoy otvetstvennosti vrachey-stomatologov. PEM. 2005; 20(4): 7-8. [Russian]
  3. Dvornyk VM, Rubanenko VV, Balya GM, Tumakova OB. Osoblyvosti ortopedychnogo likuvannya patologichnogo styrannya tverdykh tkanyn zubiv z vykorystannyam pokryvnykh proteziv. SMB. 2011; 4: 83-6. [Ukrainian]
  4. Redinov IS, Metelitsa SI, Strakh OO. Povyshenie effektivnosti povtornogo lecheniya patsientov pri polnom otsutstvii zubov na nizhney chelyusti. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya. 2014; 10(2): 356-9. [Russian]
  5. Goncharova MV, Lebedev AA. Aktualnye voprosy upravleniya meditsinskimi organizatsiyami na rynke meditsinskikh uslug. ZV. 2011; 4: 29-32. [Russian]
  6. Badyaev IV. Razrabotka sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva v stomatologicheskoy klinike. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora. 2013; 2: 54-8. [Russian]
  7. Chirkova NV. Kliniko-eksperimentalnoe obosnovanie primeneniya modifitsirovannogo elastichnogo akrilovogo polimera dlya bazisov protezov: Dis. PhDr. (Med.). Voronezh; 2003. 121 с. [Russian]
  8. Walter M, Wolf B, Wolf A, Boening K. Six-year Clinical Performance of All-Ceramic crowns with Alumina Cores. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19(2): 162-3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16602364
  9. Gazhva SI, Pashinyan GA, Aleshina OA. Analiz oshibok i oslozhneniy pri protezirovanii s primeneniem nesemnykh ortopedicheskikh konstruktsiy. Stomatologiya. 2010; 2: 7-8. [Russian]
  10. Monastyreva NN, Zoloev RV. Vliyanie oslozhneniy posle ortopedicheskogo stomatologicheskogo lecheniya na kachestvo zhizni. Stomatologiya dlya vsekh. 2013; 3: 14-5. [Russian]
  11. Medina-solis CE, Pérez-Núñez R, Maupomé G, Avila-Burgos L, Pontigo-Loyola AP, Patiño-Marín N, et al. National survey on edentulism and its geographic distribution, among Mexicans 18 years of age and older. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008; 35(4): 237-44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18321258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01767.x
  12. Danilina TF, Salyamov KYu. Otsenka kachestva stomatologicheskogo lecheniya, kak element profilaktiki v stomatologicheskoy praktike. Volgograd: OOO «Blank»; 2010. 248 p. [Russian]
  13. Severinova SK, Zhirov AI, Zhirova VG, Shabliy VF. Klinicheskaya otsenka osloneniy v ortopedicheskoy stomatologi pri protezirovanii nesemnymi konstruktsiyami. Tavricheskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik. 2013; 4(64): 125-8. [Russian]
  14. Timoshenko MV. Ostatochnaya deformatsiya ottiskov iz bezvodnykh elastomerov, poluchennykh razlichnymi metodami. Sovrem stomatologiya. 2003; 3: 44-5. [Russian]
  15. Poloneychik NM, Timoshenko MV. Sravnitelnaya kharakteristika elastomernykh ottisknykh materialov. Organizatsiya, profilaktika, novye tekhnologii i reabilitatsiya v stomatologii: Materialy 4-go sezda stomatologov Belarusi. Vitebsk, 2010. 2010: 232-5. [Russian]
  16. Perevoznikov VI. Eksperimentalno-klinicheskoe i ekonomicheskoe sravnenie sovremennykh metodov izgotovleniya nesemnykh vremennykh protezov: Dis. PhDr. (Med.). Moskva; 2012. 148 p. [Russian]
  17. Tuchik ES, Gazhva SI, Sobir RK. O znachenii uchetnoy dokumentatsii v stomatologicheskikh uchrezhdeniyakh. Aktualnye aspekty sudebnoy meditsiny i ekspertnoy praktiki. 2008; 1: 169-77. [Russian]
  18. Marchenkov AE. Neblagopriyatnye faktory, vyzyvayushchie vozniknovenie konfliktnykh situatsiy v praktike detskogo stomatologa. PEM. 2005; 19(3): 8-11. [Russian]
  19. Andreeva SN. Sistemnyy analiz otsenok, prinyatykh v praktike otechestvennoy ortopedicheskoy stomatologii: Dis. PhDr. (Med.). Moskva; 2004. 207 p. [Russian]
  20. Aleshina OA. Ob oshibkakh protezirovaniya s primeneniem nesemnykh ortopedicheskikh konstruktsiy. Materialy regionalnoy konferentsii molodykh uchenykh. Moskva-Kazan, 2009. 2009: 7-9. [Russian]
  21. Gancho OV, Yushchenko PL, Korol MD. Mikrobna zaselenist rotovoyi ridyny za umov zastosuvannya sylikonovykh vidbytkovykh materialiv pry vygotovlenni neznimnykh konstruktsiy zubnykh proteziv. Ukrayinskyy stomatologichnyy almanakh. 2012; 6: 78-85. [Ukrainian]
  22. Nuca C, Amariei DL, Rusu Т, Arendt C. Oral health-related quality of life evaluation. OHDMBSC. 2007; 1: 3-8.
  23. Dolya AV. Ob'yemne modelyuvannya mezh lozhky-bazysu termoplastychnym vidbytkovym materialom «Ortokor-ST» pry vygotovlenni povnykh znimnykh plastynkovykh proteziv: Dis. PhDr. (Med.). Kharkiv; 2010. 170 p. [Ukrainian]
  24. Narayanan A, Greco M. The Dental Practice Questionnaire: a patient feedback tool for improving the quality of dental practices. Australian Dental Journal. 2014; 59(3): 334-48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24890026. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12200
  25. Kolodina RL. Kliniko-laboratornoe obosnovanie novogo metoda polucheniya pretsizionnykh ottiskov: Dis. PhDr. (Med.). Moskva; 2010. 92 p. [Russian]
  26. Uzbekov RM. Mikrovolnovaya dezinfektsiya elastichnykh vspomogatelnykh i konstruktsionnykh materialov v klinike ortopedicheskoy stomatologii: Dis. PhDr. (Med.). Moskva; 2010. 92 p. [Russian]
  27. Sopotsinskiy DV, Parunov VV, Lebedenko IYu, Kolesov PA. Doklinicheskoe issledovanie novogo otechestvennogo splava na osnove zolota dlya metallokeramicheskikh zubnykh protezov. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2014; 4: 4-6. [Russian]
  28. Sukhorebskyy YuY. Klynyko-eksperymentalnoe obosnovanye prymenenyya metodov lytya splavov metallov dlya zubnykh protezov: Dis. PhDr. (Med.). Ivano-Frankivsk; 2009. 167 p. [Russian]
  29. Ведерникова ЛВ, Жолудев СЕ. Планирование эстетики керамических виниров без предварительного препарирования зубов. Проблемы стоматологии. 2013; 5: 32-5. [Russian]
  30. Shemetov OS, Bondaletov VA, Tumakova EB. Metody otsenki kachestva polnykh semnykh protezov. Ukrayinskiy stomatologichniy almanakh. 2010; 4: 95-6. [Russian]
  31. Hickey B, Jauhar S. Gingival veneers. Dent Update. 2009; 36(7): 422-4, 426, 428. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19810398. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2009.36.7.422
  32. Tlustenko VP, Sadykov MI, Nesterov AM, Sanososyuk NO, Tugushev RI. Optimizatsiya ortopedicheskogo lecheniya bolnykh s polnym otsutstviem zubov. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2014; 6: 50-2. [Russian]
  33. Klenkova MI. Psikhologicheskaya sostovlyayushchaya ortopedicheskogo lecheniya patsientov s polnym otsutstviem zubov. BMIK. 2015; 4: 223-4. [Russian]
  34. Trezubov VV, Kosenko LG. Pokazaniya k primeneniyu kolloidnykh adgezivnykh kremov dlya uluchsheniya fiksatsii syomnykh protezov. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya: Meditsina. 2011; 22: 249-51. [Russian]
  35. Yanishen IV. Porivnyalna otsinka yakosti znimnykh konstruktsiy zubnykh proteziv na etapakh yikh klinichnoyi ekspluatatsiyi. SMB. 2014; 4-2(47): 76-9. [Ukrainian]